HIFI-FORUM » English » Stereo (Engl.) » amp better than marantz pm7200? | |
|
amp better than marantz pm7200?+A -A |
||
Autor |
| |
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#1 erstellt: 03. Jul 2003, 17:41 | |
Hey again! the thing with the cables didn't work so I am thinking about a new amp. My old Marantz pm7200 is quite good, but somehow I want a new, better one. But which? I don't have any idea, what to buy, it would be great if you could help me. Frank |
||
stadtbusjack
Inventar |
#2 erstellt: 03. Jul 2003, 23:06 | |
Well, how much do you want to spend for your new amp? |
||
|
||
Markus
Inventar |
#3 erstellt: 04. Jul 2003, 08:51 | |
And which speakers are you using? Markus. |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#4 erstellt: 04. Jul 2003, 16:12 | |
Hey guys! My actual equiptment is: Marantz pm7200 Marantz cd6000le Wharfedale Diamond 8.2black I'm willing to spend about 1000 pounds. |
||
Markus
Inventar |
#5 erstellt: 04. Jul 2003, 16:46 | |
Hi Frank, how big is you room where you want to install the speakers? Do you prefer bookshelf speakers (sized similar to your Wharfedales)? What's you goal for an ideal sound: should it sound "beautiful" or should it reproduce the CD as ideal as possible? 1000 Pounds is about 1500 EURO (why can these brits not join the EMU, this would simplify those things ). Markus. |
||
stadtbusjack
Inventar |
#6 erstellt: 04. Jul 2003, 17:25 | |
And what kind of music do you like? |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#7 erstellt: 05. Jul 2003, 18:22 | |
Hey! As I already said, mainly classic music but also some classic rock like rolling-stones or queen. Frank |
||
stadtbusjack
Inventar |
#8 erstellt: 06. Jul 2003, 01:48 | |
Perhaps you should try a Rotel combination or pre- and poweramp. |
||
wn
Inventar |
#9 erstellt: 06. Jul 2003, 16:57 | |
Hi Frank, I share your musical orientation and I have an Arcam A-85 connected to my Q7. After replacing my old Marantz Amp with the Arcam I'm more than happy. - Regards, Wilfried |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#10 erstellt: 06. Jul 2003, 17:16 | |
Hey Wilfried! What Marantz did you have? Arcam sounds good! I'll try to find a dealer to test the A-85. Markus, sorry that I didn't answer your question earlier, I didn't see it till now My wharfedales a placed on stands, but I don't want to replace them, I am very happy with them! Frank |
||
drbobo
Inventar |
#11 erstellt: 07. Jul 2003, 16:24 | |
Welcome to hifi-forum You should also try NAD if you prerfer classics! with the combination C160/C270 you get a perfect sound system with a lot of power.... But as You know, there is much subjectivity..... |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#12 erstellt: 07. Jul 2003, 20:56 | |
NAD sounds good. I'll try to hear C160/C270 as soon as possible. Any other good NAD devices? Frank btw: I'll be checking some arcam amps within the next to days |
||
wn
Inventar |
#13 erstellt: 07. Jul 2003, 22:15 | |
Hi Frank,
I used a 3250 preamp and a 170dc poweramp. Both were completely checked at a Marantz service center and they still perform within the company specifications. The only reason to replace them was to introduce multichannel in my home office. The A85 is upgradable to 5.1 (7.1). While the sonics of the Marantz combo are excellent the A85 adds a lot of transparency and colors and the localization of single instruments are more stable. Comparing it with my more recent AV9000+MM9000 surround equipment results in an identical conclusion, however, to a lesser extend.
Would be interesting to hear your report. -Kind regards, Wilfried |
||
drbobo
Inventar |
#14 erstellt: 08. Jul 2003, 09:22 | |
@kimber-frank well, there is a "silver" series, but the price is quite different..... |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#15 erstellt: 08. Jul 2003, 19:20 | |
Hey drbobo! If the sound is better, the price may be higher. So I'll try to hear a silver-line nad, too. Frank |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#16 erstellt: 13. Jul 2003, 18:18 | |
Hey guys! After having finished checking arcam, the next brand will be NAD. My wife suggested mcintosh and accuphase, but I think this is beyond my bugdet Frank |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#17 erstellt: 22. Jul 2003, 20:16 | |
Hey! The NAD-test is finished, too. Result: I don't know, if I should buy Arcam or NAD within my budget or buy NAD out of budget. I've tested: Arcam: A75, A80 and A-85. I'd prefer A-85 in this lineup. NAD: C350, C370 and S300. S300 costs a bit more than 1000 pounds, but this would be my NAD choice. C370 and Arcam A-85 are at the same level, so I don't know which one to take :?. Or should I spend some more money and take the S300?? Or another amp? What's your opinion? Frank |
||
burki
Hat sich gelöscht |
#18 erstellt: 22. Jul 2003, 23:56 | |
Hi, take a look at myryad --> it's near NAD (former developer from Myryad are now involved by NAD) ... I've from the NAD silver line the amp S-250 and it's great strong amp (much better than the "consumer-line" from NAD), but not very cheap. Greetings Burkhardt |
||
wn
Inventar |
#19 erstellt: 24. Jul 2003, 18:33 | |
Hi Frank,
I must admit that I'm not familiar with NAD but another interesting candidate might be the Primare A 20. It comes very close to the A85 but appeared to be not the perfect match to my Q7. It might be, however, a good choice in combination with other speakers. - Kind Regards, Wilfried |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#20 erstellt: 26. Jul 2003, 19:59 | |
Hey burki, wn! @burki: I'll try he S-250. @wn: I'll try the Primare A20, too. At the moment, I think, I'll extend my limit to 1500-2000 pounds, IF I get a better sound. Frank |
||
kimber-frank
Stammgast |
#21 erstellt: 03. Sep 2003, 15:21 | |
Sorry not to have answered for some time Meanwhile I've bought the NAD S300. And I'm veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery happy with it!! I've spend more money than I wanted, but: It's really great! So thanks for your help! |
||
Manek
Inventar |
#22 erstellt: 12. Nov 2003, 08:12 | |
enjoy.....the NAD :-) quite a fan of nad myself. |
||
|
|
Das könnte Dich auch interessieren: |
Marantz PM7200 vs NAD 320 BEE Rishi am 20.04.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 21.04.2005 – 9 Beiträge |
Marantz PM7200 HappyOtter am 04.03.2004 – Letzte Antwort am 05.03.2004 – 4 Beiträge |
Marantz PM7200 hifinovice1 am 16.05.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 17.05.2005 – 5 Beiträge |
anything better than DM603S3 for money? audiojunky am 02.08.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 02.08.2005 – 4 Beiträge |
New MP3 better than CD quality ?? Arj am 27.05.2006 – Letzte Antwort am 30.05.2006 – 6 Beiträge |
Ampli: NAD350 v/s Marantz PM7200 pulcino am 29.03.2004 – Letzte Antwort am 31.03.2004 – 6 Beiträge |
Better combination Doc_hi_fi_novice am 11.12.2007 – Letzte Antwort am 25.01.2008 – 31 Beiträge |
Amp Choice SUB_BOSS am 04.04.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 17.07.2005 – 52 Beiträge |
Do expensive CD Players sound better? kousik_s am 12.09.2006 – Letzte Antwort am 13.09.2006 – 17 Beiträge |
Magic Integrated Amp, at 39USD hifinovice1 am 18.02.2005 – Letzte Antwort am 18.02.2005 – 6 Beiträge |
Anzeige
Produkte in diesem Thread
Aktuelle Aktion
Top 10 Threads in Stereo (Engl.) der letzten 7 Tage
- Good speakers for old system
- Jamo Concert E750 and E770
- Replacing Stock Jumpers on NAD/Marantz
- FYI: Cadence latest price list
- One speaker "louder" than the other?
- TNT triple T loudspeaker cable
- Vincent SV 231
- Planar speakers
- Best Amp for Quad 11L? Nad vs Rotel vs Marantz vs CA
- Is Jamo E-series worth it?
Top 10 Threads in Stereo (Engl.) der letzten 50 Tage
- Good speakers for old system
- Jamo Concert E750 and E770
- Replacing Stock Jumpers on NAD/Marantz
- FYI: Cadence latest price list
- One speaker "louder" than the other?
- TNT triple T loudspeaker cable
- Vincent SV 231
- Planar speakers
- Best Amp for Quad 11L? Nad vs Rotel vs Marantz vs CA
- Is Jamo E-series worth it?
Top 10 Suchanfragen
Forumsstatistik
- Registrierte Mitglieder927.115 ( Heute: 8 )
- Neuestes MitgliedSchnelleGazelle
- Gesamtzahl an Themen1.554.826
- Gesamtzahl an Beiträgen21.622.744