Umfrage

The ratio of audiophiles and non audiophiles

1. 1:2		(14.3 %, 1 Stimmen)
2. 1:5		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
3. 1:10		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
4. 1:20		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
5. 1:30		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
6. 1:50		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
7. 1:100		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
8. 1:500		(0 %, 0 Stimmen)
9. 1:1000		(85.7 %, 6 Stimmen)

(Zum Abstimmen müssen Sie eingeloggt sein)

The ratio of audiophiles and non audiophiles

Autor

Beitrag

Sonic_Master
Stammgast

#1 erstellt: 31. Mai 2005, 14:29

In my experience there are very few people who loves audiophile quality. But rest of them are like they want something with punchy bass, crispy treble(they particularly say not natural) etc etc...

But as many of you are highly experienced and let me know what do u say regarding this audiophile ratio

Sonic_Master
Stammgast

#2 erstellt: 31. Mai 2005, 17:50

only one vote? hmmmm...

Arj
Inventar

#3 erstellt: 31. Mai 2005, 18:33

1 : 10000000 or maybe still much less
1 in 1000 is great odds

oarnura
Ist häufiger hier

#4 erstellt: 31. Mai 2005, 18:54

Geez Sandeep you need to change you login to be poll_master. What's with all the polls? They don't give you any more useful data than just discussions in a forum.

Sonic_Master
Stammgast

#5 erstellt: 31. Mai 2005, 20:42

no no i just waana see ur opinions.. thats it man...

jsa_ind
Stammgast

#6 erstellt: 01. Jun 2005, 00:05

Dear Sandeep,

Oarnura is right, if you ask too many question & conduct too many polls, people will lose interest in your posts.

Pace your inning Sandeep....you have got a long way to go !

Your wellwisher,

Junia.

SUB_BOSS
Gesperrt

#7 erstellt: 01. Jun 2005, 07:49

Sonic master wrote :

But rest of them are like they want something with punchy bass, crispy treble(they particularly say not natural) etc etc...

oh yeah if the track I listen to contains crispy treble or punchy bass I want to hear it and feel it as well...so making it sound bland or vocal dominated and calling it audiophile quality is nonsense for me. If thats audiophile then I'm not one and don't want to be in that lunacy.Remember no combo can give you natural sound and this topic has been discussed to death...So lets make our systems sound good for our ears....To hell with other parameters..of course music has to enjoyed the way you like to listen to it and not confined to what others define it as...Just like this...

want more

can anyone define what the term audiophile means???. in your own words Please and no Ctrl+C and Ctrl+v job from other sources...IMHO this is most loosely used term like the yesteryears PMPO.

buurrrppppppppp

puff

puff

puff( smoking )

[Beitrag von SUB_BOSS am 01. Jun 2005, 08:02 bearbeitet]

Arj
Inventar

#8 erstellt: 01. Jun 2005, 09:04

well Dictionary definition (Copy Paste ..Sorry

)
is

"A person having an ardent interest in stereo or high-fidelity sound reproduction."

The key words here are ardent and sound reproduction and not music.

but this term in most forums leans so much towards would mean Knowledge and Interest in the components and aids to sound reproduction !

Whether good, Bad, True, Untrue, relevant, Non Relevant etc is all very personal

since there is no certification exam for this, anypone who feels he is an audiophile ...is one !

SUB_BOSS
Gesperrt

#9 erstellt: 01. Jun 2005, 09:47

Again this poll seems to blur the intention. it is mite impossible to draw a conclusion. I've met several guys and only after continued meetings could I discover these guys had worthy equipments. Audiophiles don't carry a tag on their foreheads...unlike easy to distinguish a spotty 17 year old and a wrinkly 70 year old..every age group, income group, diffrent stratas of society have Audiophiles( as defined by our dear friend Arj

). May be some are in the circle of Audiophiles always and some are in the company of bird watchers.....so how would the former and latter vote....your first choice by former definetely and latter for the last choice.....Anyway here have a WILLS...where there is WILLS there's a way....