B&W Speakers

+A -A
Autor
Beitrag
sammygeorge
Ist häufiger hier
#1 erstellt: 22. Okt 2005, 17:44
Would any member of the forum have experience/opinion about B& W 600 and 601 speakers. What would be a good amp to go along with them? And would NAD 320 BEE or 352 be a good match for these speakers?
Thanks
Sam
Manek
Inventar
#2 erstellt: 24. Okt 2005, 07:05
yes they would pair up decently well. I have heard these speakers, a tad bright and the warmer nad amp will compliment them well.

manek.
square_wave
Inventar
#3 erstellt: 24. Okt 2005, 15:16
I find the 600 series from B&W very ordinary for the price you pay for them. It is their entry level and has a very colored sound. Very much voiced slightly on the “boom-tizz” side to give a very exciting sound. The cabinets too are compromised which adds to the boom. Good for HT. For music I would look elsewhere. If music is your first priority I would suggest quad 11L or if your budget is slightly low - the AE Evo1, energy C series are also a good choices. If you are not very brand conscious, the Bookshelf speakers from Lyrita audio or Acoustic portrait can beat the pants off any of these entry level speakers. Much better parts/cabinets and voiced with music in mind….
Arj
Inventar
#4 erstellt: 24. Okt 2005, 17:14
the 600 series is targeted at the HT market and it is not for 2 channel Audio..

The pitfall is the Most people like sound to be high on treble and bass as it gives an impression of details and clarity (How many of your forends put on a compo with treble and bass at Baximu ? ) Almost all do henece the manufacturer voices it so !

But again it is very well engineered so if parnered with a warmish amp, as Manek mentioned, it can sound good..

Better not to fall into generalisations in speakers as each person would have heard it at a different time at a different place and with different components... so you need to hear it . there are many who find the sound to their liking as well

( you can check out audioreview)
square_wave
Inventar
#5 erstellt: 25. Okt 2005, 07:37
Yup…. I agree that the speakers are well engineered except for the cabinets which I find a bit flimsy for the money you pay. The problem I had is with the voicing. I like them only from the 700 series. In fact I found the wharfedale diamond 9.1 bookshelf speaker better value for money when compared to the 600 series bookshelf speakers. I know the 600 series is very popular at audio review.com. But consumer reviews can be very misleading. If you read the reviews for 600 series, most are written by newbie audiophiles and they will definitely like the 600 series. I guess sammy needs to listen and decide. He may like them. I was just suggesting alternatives for better value for money.
Arj
Inventar
#6 erstellt: 25. Okt 2005, 11:01
For me, having heard it with a Rotel and a Marantz (I think) Technically the speaker is quite good..it has good freq curves etc etc.. but musically: Zilch, Nada

If you want a good value for money speaker, try out the Infinity Primus 160. heard it recently and must say has a very Clean sound (Thats the only way i can describe it ) !
sammygeorge
Ist häufiger hier
#7 erstellt: 25. Okt 2005, 11:26
Thanks for the suggestions. What is the difference between Wharfedale 9.1 and 9.2?
square_wave
Inventar
#8 erstellt: 25. Okt 2005, 15:38
I guess 9.2 are slightly bigger bookshelf speakers. I heard the 9.1 with NAD separates and found it to be quite clean with none of the usual nasties associated with budget bookshelf speakers. I am not saying it is very good…..it is very good value for the money. Don’t be blinded by the b&w sticker. Hear out others too before you part with your money. I normally stay away from the lowest line of speakers from any brand. They are the most compromised and they charge a bomb for the brand name.
audio_engr
Ist häufiger hier
#9 erstellt: 25. Okt 2005, 23:29
I too heard the Wharfedale 8.2s & the 9.1s with Cambridge Audio electronics Azur 540 series amp & CDP and later with the NAD C-320BEE & 521BEE. Interconn were Ecosse Composer, Conductor & also vdH D102-Mk3-Hybrid. Pretty decent sound for the money I must say regarding the Wharfedales though dont expect too much. Nevertheless, what ever they do, they do hold their composure and for acoustic music, I reckon they wont let you down. Felt NAD combo was a much better choice.

I am yet to hear the 9.2 but its my guess the sound would be a little bit fuller and would probably suit most people's rooms better.

Do note that these babies mandate you biwire them - which the dealer wouldn't ever do and demonstrate. Do insist on this for a critical listen. They make a good difference.

I'm keen in the 9.2s for a friend who is looking for a 2-ch setup for his 11 x 12 ft den. Wonder how much differences there is between the 8.2s & the 9.2s? Comments would be welcomed.

By the way, if you can stretch to the Quad 12L, they are great & sober for acoustic music.


[Beitrag von audio_engr am 25. Okt 2005, 23:30 bearbeitet]
sammygeorge
Ist häufiger hier
#10 erstellt: 26. Okt 2005, 08:55
Thanks again...sorry to sound naive...but what is biwiring? And how to go about it? Where does one get " Ecosse Composer, Conductor & vdH D102-Mk3-Hybrid."
Krish
Stammgast
#11 erstellt: 26. Okt 2005, 09:14
Sammygeorge,

Click on this link for an explanation on biwiring

http://www.whathifi....D=59&newssectionID=3

Click here for dope on cabling

http://www.whathifi....D=27&newssectionID=3

Hope this helps

K
audio_engr
Ist häufiger hier
#12 erstellt: 26. Okt 2005, 09:36
Biwiring is done using either a 4-core biwiring cable or with 2 separate runs of a standard 2-core loudspeaker cable.

At the speaker end, you'll find 2 sets of binding posts; +ve & -ve for LF (Low Freq) and similarly +ve & -ve for HF (High freq). If you use 2 sets of std speaker cables, connect one set cables to LF & the other to the HF (careful that phases are maintained correctly).

At the amp end, there's usually a single set of +ve & -ve terminals. Join the +ve of the LF & HF together and insert this to the +ve of the amp. Similarly, do the same with the -ve terminals.

One of the problems with a standard crossover is that since one pair of cables carries the signal to & from the amp, bass signals can tend to swamp the more delicate treble stuff, especially in the return (or -ve) connection back to the amp. Intermodulation distortion.

Benefits: By separating the signal all the way back to amplifier's output stage, using two runs of cable or a purpose-made four conductor biwire cable, these effects can be greatly reduced.

Generally, british speakers coming from good reputed manufacturers will cater biwiring. It is my humble suggestion that this be used as intended. Freaks may move on to biamping, i.e. providing separate amp channels to each drivers.

Hope this explaination helps.

Ecosse cables can be sourced from Soundsmiths, Mumbai or any of their dealers. vdH (van den Hul) again from Innovative Audio or Lakosy in Mumbai.
Arj
Inventar
#13 erstellt: 26. Okt 2005, 11:11

sammygeorge schrieb:
Thanks again...sorry to sound naive...but what is biwiring? And how to go about it? Where does one get " Ecosse Composer, Conductor & vdH D102-Mk3-Hybrid."


Suggest you tune your ears by single wiring first !

it is again a controversial topic and once you are into it would be able to get a better understanding...but since oyu are beginning, better to be single
square_wave
Inventar
#14 erstellt: 26. Okt 2005, 13:38
I second that………….Unless you have lot of money, get the best single cable you can and just single wire. Later save up and buy another set of the same quality and bi-wire. I guess most in the market for budget speakers won’t be able to afford double lengths of high-quality wires for bi-wiring.
MFox
Ist häufiger hier
#15 erstellt: 26. Nov 2005, 22:54

Arj schrieb:
it is again a controversial topic and once you are into it would be able to get a better understanding...but since oyu are beginning, better to be single :D


Yeah, it's really a controversial topic. I tried it out and actually couldn't hear that much of a difference(tried it with b&w803s).

But where I really could hear a difference was trying a cable with a greater diameter. I went once from 1mm to 2,5mm and my front speakers suddenly sounded different(each cable is about 3m long). I also tried a diameter of 4mm, but there was no more noticeable change though. I read somewhere that if your distance to the speakers ranges longer than 10m, then a diameter of 4mm starts to make sense.
Suche:
Das könnte Dich auch interessieren:
Of Speakers and Roaches
soulforged am 21.04.2006  –  Letzte Antwort am 05.05.2006  –  41 Beiträge
Stereo and Computer Speakers
Alexb123 am 12.01.2004  –  Letzte Antwort am 12.01.2004  –  6 Beiträge
Budget amp and speakers. Help!!
Psycholic am 30.06.2005  –  Letzte Antwort am 30.06.2005  –  8 Beiträge
speakers for nad c320 bee
stevieboy am 29.12.2004  –  Letzte Antwort am 11.02.2005  –  80 Beiträge
Speakers with NAD 740
samsam am 23.03.2005  –  Letzte Antwort am 25.03.2005  –  5 Beiträge
Good 5.1 speakers to go with Denon Amp?
trivisingh am 02.01.2005  –  Letzte Antwort am 02.01.2005  –  2 Beiträge
Would a Mini-compo be a good source?
Neutral am 15.06.2005  –  Letzte Antwort am 09.09.2005  –  26 Beiträge
Is Rotel RB-1080 amp a good match for B&W DM602 S3?
whitese am 04.10.2003  –  Letzte Antwort am 15.06.2005  –  27 Beiträge
speakers for NAD C521BEE/C320BEE
mr_vishal am 01.02.2005  –  Letzte Antwort am 13.09.2006  –  162 Beiträge
Speakers for NAD C352
in_step am 29.03.2005  –  Letzte Antwort am 29.03.2005  –  8 Beiträge
Foren Archiv
2005

Anzeige

Aktuelle Aktion

Partner Widget schließen

  • beyerdynamic Logo
  • DALI Logo
  • SAMSUNG Logo
  • TCL Logo

Forumsstatistik Widget schließen

  • Registrierte Mitglieder925.721 ( Heute: 11 )
  • Neuestes Mitgliedgune
  • Gesamtzahl an Themen1.551.048
  • Gesamtzahl an Beiträgen21.536.766

Hersteller in diesem Thread Widget schließen